I will audit your AI model's answers in pharmacy and life sciences

Paras

Paras

Data annotation & AI training data

Founding Seller ✓ Service reviewed by our team New on RemoteAI ⏱ Delivery from 2 days
I will audit your AI model's answers in pharmacy and life sciences I will audit your AI model's answers in pharmacy and life sciences I will audit your AI model's answers in pharmacy and life sciences I will audit your AI model's answers in pharmacy and life sciences

About this service

I help AI labs, HealthTech teams, and foundation model developers eliminate dangerous hallucinations in pharmaceutical, chemical, and life sciences reasoning. General annotators miss subtle scientific errors—like broken kinetics formulas or toxicological miscalculations. As an Assistant Professor of Pharmacy with an M.Pharm (CGPI: 8.58), I audit your model’s step-by-step logic against empirical laboratory standards. How I Work & Tools Used:I test prompts and evaluate outputs using Python (Pandas, SciPy) for kinetic boundary checks, ProTox-III for toxicity and LD50 validation, and Design-Expert for DoE verification. For multimodal tasks, I audit chemical spectra, chromatograms, and lab tables using ImageJ and OCR tools. Real Project Result:In benchmarking a life sciences reasoning dataset, I resolved 120+ deep pharmacological edge cases—catching subtle formulation errors, including correcting an uncalibrated MCF-7 cytotoxic IC50 threshold of 332.61 µg/mL and aligning dissolution curve-fitting to strict 99% regression boundaries. What You Receive:Side-by-side audited evaluation logs with severity tags (Critical, Major, Minor)Verified Chain-of-Thought (CoT) problem sets with singular ground-truth referencesActionable safety rubrics and adversarial edge-case test suites tailored to your model's target benchmarks
Data Annotation Claude Gemini Prompt Engineering

What Paras needs from you to start

To start the evaluation sprint, please provide: Project Objective & Task Type: (e.g., RLHF evaluation, CoT reasoning verification, adversarial red-teaming, or domain test-suite generation). Evaluation Guidelines & Rubrics: Your grading criteria, severity thresholds (critical, major, minor), attribution standards, and edge-case definitions. Input Data / Target Prompts: The raw prompts, model response pairs, or technical source files (CSV, JSONL, Google Sheets, or PDF). Specific Scientific/Technical Focus: Any particular domains required (e.g., pharmacokinetics, dissolution modeling, analytical spectra, chemical safety, or medical literature fact-checking). Output Format Preference: Your preferred delivery schema (structured JSON, annotated spreadsheet, or markdown report).

Compare packages

Package $70 Essential $200 Standard $450 Premium
Included
  • ✓Audit of up to 50 model outputs/responses against scientific ground truth, tagged with sev
  • ✓Audit of up to 200 model responses with side-by-side verification, plus a synthesis report
  • ✓Creation of 50 complex, graduate-level pharmaceutical/chemical test prompts with verified
Delivery 2 days4 days5 days
Revisions 123

FAQ

Which file formats and evaluation environments do you accept? +

I accept datasets in CSV, JSON, JSONL, XLSX, Google Sheets, or PDF. I can also perform live evaluations directly inside your proprietary annotation interface, Label Studio, or custom evaluation portal if guest/evaluator access is provided.

What specific pharmaceutical and life sciences subfields do you cover? +

My core domain coverage includes novel drug delivery systems (NDDS, niosomes, liposomes), pharmacokinetics and release kinetics, analytical chemistry data (HPLC, UV-Vis spectra, dissolution profiles), in-silico toxicology (LD50, organ toxicity), and OTC/prescription regulatory standards.

How do you identify and categorize scientific hallucinations? +

I evaluate responses using multi-tier severity classifications: Critical: Factually hazardous medical claims, inverted therapeutic dosing, or invalid chemical safety profiles. Major: Mathematically broken release equations, kinetic boundary violations, or misattributed analytical peaks. Minor: Slight nomenclature discrepancies or formatting deviations that do not alter the underlying scientific validity.

Can you deliver step-by-step Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning data? +

Yes. I formulate and audit explicit step-by-step derivation paths, mathematical formulas, and empirical literature citations to ensure every reasoning link can be evaluated independently by your fine-tuning pipeline.

About the seller

Paras

Paras ✓ Reviewed talent

View full profile →
Member since
Nov 2026
Services
1

M.Pharm academic, published researcher, and registered pharmacist specializing in life sciences AI evaluation, CoT reasoning verification, and adversarial red-teaming. I audit chemical safety, drug kinetics, and complex multimodal data against empirical lab benchmarks to eliminate technical hallucinations.

Data AnnotationClaudeGeminiPrompt Engineeringprompt engineeringText-to-Speechgeminiclaude

Reviews

No reviews yet

Reviews appear after completed orders. Only buyers who paid for this service on RemoteAI can leave one.

More Data annotation & AI training data services

From

$70

See packages